Book of Choice Summary and Review
For my book of choice, I read “The Jazz of Physics” by Stephon Alexander. This book is about how music and physics are very similar, and how the best scientists and musicians use equations to learn a den improvise their skills. It talks a lot about cosmology and how music notes and intervals had a role in the creation of galaxies. It uses music as an analogy essentially in teaching people about physics, cosmology, and geometry.
The argument of this book is basically saying that music, physics, geometry, cosmology, these all used to be seen as one. And that the people greatest in these areas still see it that way. They use all of these in all of these areas to further expand their knowledge in the individual subjects. I don't disagree with this because if it's a good enough statement to have a book written about it then it can't be crazy. However, I don't have enough knowledge in any of these subjects to have a big opinion on it. I do think though that the examples he gave throughout the book really helped his argument. I could see music and physics being somewhat similar equation wise, but I'm not sure about everything else. Not that it's wrong, I just don't have enough knowledge.
I think if someone already understands physics a little bit, this would be a great book for them. It teaches you a lot about the different areas and how they connect, and it also teaches you about a lot of different people and what they have done within their career which I really enjoyed. The book could be good for someone who doesn't know anything about physics, but I think it would be more beneficial for someone who already knows a little bit about what the book is saying.
Thank you everyone for an amazing year! <3 ;)
The argument of this book is basically saying that music, physics, geometry, cosmology, these all used to be seen as one. And that the people greatest in these areas still see it that way. They use all of these in all of these areas to further expand their knowledge in the individual subjects. I don't disagree with this because if it's a good enough statement to have a book written about it then it can't be crazy. However, I don't have enough knowledge in any of these subjects to have a big opinion on it. I do think though that the examples he gave throughout the book really helped his argument. I could see music and physics being somewhat similar equation wise, but I'm not sure about everything else. Not that it's wrong, I just don't have enough knowledge.
I think if someone already understands physics a little bit, this would be a great book for them. It teaches you a lot about the different areas and how they connect, and it also teaches you about a lot of different people and what they have done within their career which I really enjoyed. The book could be good for someone who doesn't know anything about physics, but I think it would be more beneficial for someone who already knows a little bit about what the book is saying.
Thank you everyone for an amazing year! <3 ;)
Comments
Post a Comment